Go to the mobile version of this Web site.

Login | Contact Us | Site Map | Paid archives | Alerts | Electronic edition | Advertise | Subscribe to the paper | Today's Extras
Subscribe

Attorneys: Sen. Tapia's vote legal

But sponsorship of Colorado State Fair measured questioned

Published April 16, 2008 at 11 p.m.

Text size  

The second-ranking Senate Democrat probably should have disclosed that his company had Colorado State Fair contracts before he voted to approve funds to repay fair loans but he likely didn't break any laws, according to a legal opinion issued Wednesday.

The opinion was drafted by legislative lawyers at the request of Sen. Abel Tapia, D-Pueblo, who owns Abel Engineering Professionals, which is the subject of an investigation.

The attorneys said they found no evidence or guarantee that Tapia or his company would have derived, as a result of the vote, a direct financial benefit that would have been greater than a benefit received by others in the engineering profession.

However, they said, Tapia should have avoided sponsoring legislation that benefited the state fair because of a potential appearance of personal financial interest. They also said he should have disclosed his business relationship to the General Assembly.

The opinion, which is not binding, was delivered Wednesday to the legislative Ethics Board which is reviewing seven contracts worth $480,000 that Tapia's company has received from the state fair during the past seven years.

Tapia, the Senate's president pro tem, asked for the investigation last week after reporters questioned a 2006 bill he sponsored to pay off state fair loans. He has said his company bid on the contracts, that he had no role in deciding which company won and believes he did nothing wrong.

During the time the contracts were awarded, Tapia was chairman of the Joint Budget Committee, which sets the state's spending priorities, and Senate Appropriations, which decides which projects are funded.

Tapia said he voted on bills that later funded the contracts but said it's the state, not the Legislature, that decides how the money is spent.

Larry Friedberg, spokesman for the Department of Personnel and Administration that reviews state contracts, told the four-member ethics panel that there was no evidence state contracting rules were bypassed in awarding the contracts to Tapia.

Friedberg said companies are chosen for the ability to do the work, ranked and given an opportunity to negotiate a contract. If no agreement is reached, other ranked companies are given the opportunity to negotiate.

Post your comment

Registration is required. Click here to create your free user account, or login below.

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.




(Forgotten your password?)




News Tip

Know about something we should be reporting? Tell us about it.


Reprints